Cinema Act: Ignorant
The majors have drawn all the laws supposedly protecting patriotic film. we have turned this film (GRAN VIA) to see this movie (THE STAR WARS) to go to a multiplex, and what it take to see if one is not going wrong. They expelled
English cinema has achieved almost no place in this model.
If there are in every major city or geographic area a 16-screen multiplex with digital projectors to premiere 4 movies a week with 4 weeks minimum display, 5 € entry (7 € for the majors now) would be filled.
Since currently all multiplexes broadcast the same movies, not compete, just go to see "IN" to the more comfortable you come near, or near where 're going to go after or before.
These scenarios can come shopping facilities financed by the Ministry to devote some money to finance production to fund the exhibition. Some of the money in advance to ensure display changed enough to recover the box office and TV rights - more because of the reputation of the exhibition halls - the investment.
Because they are real estate - the multiplex - the ICO could give 100% mortgages to 50 years with lack of self-depreciation and amortization -
to 15 years in residential mortgage usually equal the rent, and 25, by inflation becomes laughable - and the ministry endorse
shares, to be paid for the box office and only if at the start of business would not give enough to pay, recovering when business improves. Most improbable thing - that's not to cover - if you are gingerly at first.
The purchaser of the multiplex could be a foundation for all members of all levels of film, or every room a different foundation of each sector of the film academy, actors, producers, etc.
Its workers, copying here in Hollywood, should be actors extras actors in training or are unemployed or temporarily out of work, not only considering the multiplex - that is minimized in personnel - also traditional cuisine restaurants regional annexes English.
still not been exploited by organized networks of regional English cuisine, it is easier to find a Mexican, Tex Mex, Italian, oriental or an Asturian, Valencian, Andalusian and Catalan in a large area. Gallegos is some, but not chains, and the first that you can approach to export formulas. Why do not the actors guild as a job waiting for the next paper.? Better if students in conjunction with recently hatched and / or school practices of restoration.
Try is a breeze, exhibitors complain that business is bad, a purchase of a multi-take away a nightmare right? and the buyer to display the ONLY product of competition, lower prices, in a single multiplex, have crowded rooms, will be purchased in advance for weekends and weekdays will be far more people than in other rooms.
then be measured how many of these multiplexes should be in the big cities, or whether there should be one per 100, 200 or 300 thousand inhabitants. But currently there is NO. And I bet that would work in Madrid, Barcelona, \u200b\u200bValencia, Malaga, Sevilla, Zaragoza, Bilbao, and almost certainly in all provincial capitals, cities and areas of more than 100,000 inhabitants.
cost little money this - if it costs - to the Ministry (part of the interest not covered by income, given that fact, and repayable in the future), and would report income not only producers, but unemployed actors - less spending on services for the state - and the foundations of cinema. all without having to legislate anything.
These multiplex can also be established in major world capitals, with subtitles, and large concentrations of English speakers, Buenos Aires, Mexico City, Miami, New York, Los Angeles, Guatemala, Bogota, and so on. Providing a market for the producers who now do not dream of a ridiculous cost - If it knew - or even almost certain income.
This model is not necessarily better than one might think, but far better than what has hitherto been attempted through legislation, the English film has the same audience that Americans on TV, no worse, if you put a little cheaper and a multi-face almost dozen that make the "other" be filled, and more than any law.
why I say it's illustrious ignorant, honoring the great comedy show of D +, anything I have done has helped to stop or change the plan of the majors, it's time to make just the competition.
this system for 50 weeks to showcase 200 films for 1 month. Obviously the most successful will be extended, but it would just display the range of 100% of national production at least one month in a room in each major population area in addition to leaving a few titles that follow the law majors or compelling them to these are almost necessarily be of "revival."
Displaying movie a month regain the recommendation of the film, for the most poorly promoted, novice or less hook, to the public more selective when going to the movies. Many who go to movies, and there they choose, more than 25% of the time, instead of going to the "other" go to the cinema to see other English film, and those who have to prepare for the competition will be the other, even in its field, at least in the big cities, they remain private foundations, would be foolish if you do not try to jump at least big cities.
But not fall that short, smart policy solutions, which are few.
Thanks for reading my opinions but disagrees with them.
0 comments:
Post a Comment