Wednesday, February 9, 2011
Smallest Tent Trailer
Mercury Rising:
much improved with much hope I have seen several gatherings of "Mercury Rising", I must admit that I liked it better than other talk shows but I expected something more like the old Key.
In my opinion the burden of this and other gatherings is that pundits have been attacked by many professional journalists. 
a gathering to learn from personally do not want to listen to pundits commonplace to hear again, I see and hear all persons whose profession gives them extensive knowledge of the topic to discuss, possibly from different disciplines, to address the issue from different angles, lawyers and doctors, and plurality of views. The best interventions are usually staged by the guests, if they usually respond to this profile.
If this program evolves to have only a journalist, it leads, or at most 3, which leads one "right" and a "left" the pundits, of right and left, or other opposing positions, not necessarily because everything is measured in these terms, the debates would be rich, you learn things - most of the real debate of ideas is not what the press publishes - and points of view does not currently counted in the public.
is easy, if it is cultivated in finding speakers on the Internet, with vast knowledge in the field. TV3 usually invited to talks and debates people of this profile, the university can also find teachers and students with views that show the general public based on sources not available to those who have to say all day because they need too long.
For example in the energy debate, any expert ecologist dismantled in 4 issues of the fallacies repeated by energy companies, for example, say that nuclear power is cheaper, but do not count the cost of manufacturing nuclear weapons, with the same way count the cost of energy as wind or solar would cost zero. If you do the numbers - all the costs, both fixed and variable - nuclear energy is ruinous, not counting the externalities, or environmental costs, both in money unaccounted for, as the government paying lie done nuclear, or pay for private benefit of our taxes. Sell \u200b\u200benergy to France for some time, and continue to lie saying that French buy nuclear energy, not buy, therefore, neither French nor nuclear. France is certainly cheaper to buy our surplus more nuclear. this, that I knew only I've heard on TV on TV3.
A program that could be inspired to invite commentators is Millennium.
Ignorance of what is left is that, even among journalists and pundits that we witnessed recently in Saved a question that says "Property of housing? Is not that capitalism? properly answered by the mayor of Marinaleda, the left is not against private property, only against the private ownership of the means of production. It is not against small farms, or against the SMEs, is against oligopolies and estates, against who have masters and slaves, as entrepreneurs, owners of bars, restaurants, a small factory even have to work, the oligopolists if they go wrong business saves the state.
- Regardless of the culture of the writers, well done to dispel a question common to the English site, since the school does not usually teach this concept so basic characteristic of the left resulting in the misunderstanding of its principles. What I say is that this should be a basic knowledge acquired in the compulsory basic education, so that merely asking the question should shame the ignorant ago by -
In this crisis, blame the banks, it helps the banks but not to those who suffer, mainly by the withdrawal of bank credit. If that money had been spent to lend to SMEs and citizens through a public bank can counter a banking family that had been ruined - I doubt it - but not thousands of families and small businesses as it has happened and is happening.
And despite all the aid received because of their mismanagement, still do not provide credit, so it is impossible to generate wealth. If you do not give loans to buy flats not bought, not built, and there is unemployment. Known the average needs of homes per year in Spain: a 400.000/año, you can take to 1,000,000 in a year, the market is saturated, That should have been curbed, and the banks themselves. But as donkeys are to solve the problem no longer give loans to buy those homes, and to do more, even if at a slower pace and those who work in construction can purchase these flats.
logical thing would have been for the state, rather than help the banks, had bought the surplus of homes, and had put on a rental basis, limiting the licenses to 300,000 / year and go gradually selling the surplus in each period, recovering the money from surplus. Leaving a buffer policy Kuznets cycle - 7 fat years and 7 lean - the little variance allowing construction the number of homes built per year.
That if I have to hear from Iñaki Gabilondo construction sector is unsustainable, a common place, what if they had 1000 licenses to radio or TV boundary, or a year, 10,000 movies filmed English, or hiciese oven twice daily bread to sell? The trouble with clichés is that not only feed the minds of journalists and the majority of the population is also fueling the minds of those who govern us, not just politicians, heads of oligopolies also and so it goes. That
right if you do not agree that education is taught Citizenship and see if some are and they know the why of things, so far a few commentators are heard of the reasons, especially because to analyze need to read and have read more than talk, books, many of them cumbersome, to remove half the best idea, and for years, and of course can hardly have time for that, and is very sweet charge for repeat platitudes instead of inviting experts in the field, and study a little to know to ask .
penultimate
But I heard the nonsense of an alleged leftist Christian religion became the religion of war to love and that Islam was not made that transition.Empire Romano after the Nicene council and adopted Christianity, since Christians "love" have been the most warlike, bellicose probably be expelled to the most educated and peaceful Arabs of the peninsula, and also to the Jews, no known major Islamist wars in recent centuries, the conflict between Islam and the West - Read Oh Jesuralem - USA's fault that requires the UN to create the state of Israel, and is very focused on U.S. oil allied countries who finance a right-wing terrorist movement Islamic terrorism of ETA CATHOLIC Catholic nobody calls him - there was no intervention of a journalist who suggested -.
I'm an atheist, but the Islamists tend to have a gala to be hospitable and nice people, and I can not say the same of Catholics with whom I have educated, rather pride themselves on the opposite, that if fulfilling all the rites, it is almost impossible know any Catholic who knows the second commandment of God in Exodus or first law - about slavery - are often ignorant of their own alleged beliefs, unaware that the horoscope is a heresy, and Catholics are not out of conviction, but by tradition repeating familiar platitudes false conservatives who have nothing to do with what they say is their religion, even deciding at their convenience to be taken at face value of his books sacred and no.
Following these journalists confuse religion with religious sentiment traditional clothing, not long ago that women dressed in black Ibiza headscarf, that women should cover their hair when entering churches, and of course still can not be priests, although a little over a century are considered to have souls, before the animals were like, soulless.
has been secularism and atheism that modernity has brought or has been brought by it in an evolutionary process, despite a majority in the Catholic education through subsidized private schools, private and public own the 215, the English is considered an atheist, and to show a mental pie because of the - poor - education 27% is considered, hang on, Catholics, non-practicing, non-believers in God, or atheists.
52% Catholic 20% is considered a practitioner, and 32% - Memory write - not practicing. I would like this survey asks about whether they believe in horoscopes, if they agree with the 2 nd Commandment - Thou shalt not 20:4, or any likeness of anything that is up in heaven or on earth beneath, or the water under the earth - or would you be in favor of a religion that prohibits the sculpture, painting? or you believe in a god to forbid painting and sculpture? "And one slave?
Finally, most economists, most graduates, and doctors if you really want to do a talking red hot.
Thanks for reading my opinions but disagrees with them.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment